Exogenous versus Endogenous Separation
Shigeru Fujita and
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2012, vol. 4, issue 4, 68-93
This paper assesses how various approaches to modeling the separation margin affect the quantitative ability of the Mortensen-Pissarides labor matching model. The model with a constant separation rate fails to produce realistic volatility and productivity responsiveness of the separation rate and worker flows. The specification with endogenous separation succeeds along these dimensions. Allowing for on-the-job search enables the model to replicate the Beveridge curve. All specifications, however, fail to generate sufficient volatility of the job finding rate. While adopting the Hagedorn-Manovskii calibration remedies this problem, the volume of job-to-job transitions in the on-the-job search specification becomes essentially zero. (JEL E24, J41, J64)
JEL-codes: E24 J41 J64 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mac.4.4.68
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (30) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmac:v:4:y:2012:i:4:p:68-93
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics is currently edited by Simon Gilchrist
More articles in American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().