Blunt Instruments: Avoiding Common Pitfalls in Identifying the Causes of Economic Growth
Samuel Bazzi and
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2013, vol. 5, issue 2, 152-86
Concern has intensified in recent years that many instrumental variables used in widely-cited growth regressions may be invalid, weak, or both. Attempts to remedy this general problem remain inadequate. We show how a range of published studies can offer more evidence that their results are not spurious. Key steps include: grounding growth regressions in more generalized theoretical models, deployment of new methods for estimating sensitivity to violations of exclusion restrictions, opening the "black box" of GMM with supportive evidence of instrument strength, and utilization of weak-instrument robust tests and estimators. (JEL C52, E23, F35, O41, O47)
JEL-codes: C52 E23 F35 O41 O47 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mac.5.2.152
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (165) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmac:v:5:y:2013:i:2:p:152-86
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics is currently edited by Simon Gilchrist
More articles in American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().