Why Voting? A Welfare Analysis
Moritz Drexl and
Andreas Kleiner ()
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2018, vol. 10, issue 3, 253-71
This article studies costly signaling. The signaling effort is chosen in multiple periods and observed with noise. The signaler benefits from the belief of the market, not directly from the effort or the signal. Optimal signaling behavior in time-varying environments trades off effort-smoothing and influencing belief exactly when it yields a return. If the return to signaling first increases over time and then decreases, then the optimal effort rises slowly, reaches its maximum before the return does, and declines quickly. Advertising data displays this pattern.
JEL-codes: D71 D72 D82 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mic.20160337
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
https://www.aeaweb.org/articles/attachments?retrie ... vbHBngM62shh-s24IOr9 (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: Why Voting? A Welfare Analysis (2013)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:10:y:2018:i:3:p:253-71
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics is currently edited by Johannes Hörner
More articles in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().