On the Relationship between Preferential and Multilateral Trade Liberalization: The Case of Customs Unions
Kamal Saggi (),
Alan Woodland () and
Halis Yildiz ()
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2013, vol. 5, issue 1, 63-99
This paper compares equilibrium outcomes of two games of trade liberalization. In the Bilateralism game, countries choose whether to liberalize trade preferentially via a customs union (CU ), multilaterally, or not at all. The Multilateralism game is a restricted version of the Bilateralism game in that countries cannot form CUs and can only undertake non-discriminatory trade liberalization. When countries have symmetric endowments, global free trade is the only stable equilibrium of both games. Allowing for endowment asymmetry, we isolate circumstances where the option to form CUs helps further the cause of multilateral liberalization as well as where it does not. (JEL F12, F13)
JEL-codes: F12 F13 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mic.5.1.63
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations View citations in EconPapers (31) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
Working Paper: On the Relationship between Preferential and Multilateral Trade Liberalization: The Case of Customs Unions (2011)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:5:y:2013:i:1:p:63-99
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Journal: Microeconomics is currently edited by Johannes Hörner
More articles in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().