EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Inefficiency Measurement

Christopher Chambers and Alan Miller

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2014, vol. 6, issue 2, 79-92

Abstract: We introduce an ordinal model of efficiency measurement. Our primitive is a notion of efficiency that is comparative, but not cardinal or absolute. In this framework, we postulate axioms that an ordinal efficiency measure should satisfy. Primary among these are choice consistency and planning consistency, which guide the measurement of efficiency in a firm with access to multiple technologies. Other axioms include scale invariance, strong monotonicity, and a continuity condition. These axioms characterize a family of path-based measures. By replacing the continuity condition with symmetry, we obtain the coefficient of resource utilization.

JEL-codes: D24 D60 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mic.6.2.79
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.6.2.79 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/ds/0602/2012-0193_ds.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:79-92

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics is currently edited by Johannes Hörner

More articles in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-22
Handle: RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:6:y:2014:i:2:p:79-92