Voter Preferences, Polarization, and Electoral Policies

Yuichiro Kamada and Fuhito Kojima

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 2014, vol. 6, issue 4, 203-36

Abstract: In most variants of the Hotelling-Downs model of election, it is assumed that voters have concave utility functions. This assumption is arguably justified in issues such as economic policies, but convex utilities are perhaps more appropriate in others such as moral or religious issues. In this paper we analyze the implications of convex utility functions in a two-candidate probabilistic voting model with a polarized voter distribution. We show that the equilibrium policies diverge if and only if voters' utility function is sufficiently convex. If two or more issues are involved, policies converge in "concave issues" and diverge in "convex issues"

JEL-codes: D72 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
Note: DOI: 10.1257/mic.6.4.203
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (24)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/mic.6.4.203 (application/pdf)
http://www.aeaweb.org/aej/mic/ds/0604/2013-0142_ds.zip (application/zip)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aejmic:v:6:y:2014:i:4:p:203-36

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

American Economic Journal: Microeconomics is currently edited by Johannes Hörner

More articles in American Economic Journal: Microeconomics from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().