Stealth Consolidation: Evidence from an Amendment to the Hart-Scott-Rodino Act
Thomas G. Wollmann
American Economic Review: Insights, 2019, vol. 1, issue 1, 77-94
Prospective merger review is the most frequent application of antitrust law. It exempts transactions on the basis of size, though small deals can have large anticompetitive effects in segmented industries. I examine its impact on antitrust enforcement and merger activity in the context of an abrupt increase in the US exemption threshold. I find that among newly-exempt deals, antitrust investigations fall to almost zero while mergers between competitors rise sharply. Effectively all of the rise reflects an endogenous response of firms to reduced premerger scrutiny, consistent with large deterrent effects of antitrust enforcement.
JEL-codes: G34 G38 K21 L41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20180137
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aerins:v:1:y:2019:i:1:p:77-94
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review: Insights is currently edited by Amy Finkelstein
More articles in American Economic Review: Insights from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().