Honesty via Choice-Matching
Blake Riley and
American Economic Review: Insights, 2019, vol. 1, issue 2, 179-92
We introduce choice-matching, a class of mechanisms for eliciting honest responses to a multiple choice question (MCQ), as might appear in a market research study, opinion poll, or economics experiment. Under choice-matching, respondents are compensated through an auxiliary task, e.g., a personal consumption choice or a forecast. Their compensation depends both on their performance on the auxiliary task, and on the performance of those respondents who matched their response to the MCQ. We give conditions for such mechanisms to be strictly truth-inducing, focusing on a special case in which the auxiliary task is to predict the answers of other respondents.
JEL-codes: C78 C83 D81 D82 D83 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20180227
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aerins:v:1:y:2019:i:2:p:179-92
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review: Insights is currently edited by Amy Finkelstein
More articles in American Economic Review: Insights from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().