Divest, Disregard, or Double Down? Philanthropic Endowment Investments in Objectionable Firms
Brigitte Roth Tran
American Economic Review: Insights, 2019, vol. 1, issue 2, 241-56
How much, if at all, should an endowment invest in a firm whose activities run counter to the charitable missions the endowment funds? I offer the first model characterizing this type of investment decision. I introduce a strategy called "mission hedging," where—in contrast to traditional socially responsible investing—foundations may benefit from skewing investment toward the objectionable firm in order to align funding availability with need. I characterize the trade-offs driving foundation investment decisions. By leveraging the idiosyncratic firm risk typically diversified away in profit-maximizing portfolios, foundations may find that bad actors provide good opportunities to hedge mission-specific risks.
JEL-codes: G11 G14 L31 M14 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20180347
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aerins:v:1:y:2019:i:2:p:241-56
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review: Insights is currently edited by Amy Finkelstein
More articles in American Economic Review: Insights from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().