Statistical Nonsignificance in Empirical Economics
American Economic Review: Insights, 2020, vol. 2, issue 2, 193-208
Statistical significance is often interpreted as providing greater information than nonsignificance. In this article we show, however, that rejection of a point null often carries very little information, while failure to reject may be highly informative. This is particularly true in empirical contexts that are common in economics, where datasets are large and there are rarely reasons to put substantial prior probability on a point null. Our results challenge the usual practice of conferring point null rejections a higher level of scientific significance than non-rejections. Therefore, we advocate visible reporting and discussion of nonsignificant results.
JEL-codes: C12 C90 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Note: DOI: 10.1257/aeri.20190252
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
Access to full text is restricted to AEA members and institutional subscribers.
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:aerins:v:2:y:2020:i:2:p:193-208
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
Access Statistics for this article
American Economic Review: Insights is currently edited by Amy Finkelstein
More articles in American Economic Review: Insights from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().