The Promise and Pitfalls of Using Imprecise School Accountability Measures

Thomas J. Kane and Doug Staiger

Journal of Economic Perspectives, 2002, vol. 16, issue 4, 91-114

Abstract: In recent years, most states have constructed elaborate accountability systems using school-level test scores. However, because the median elementary school contains only 69 children per grade level, such measures are quite imprecise. We evaluate the implications for school accountability systems. For instance, rewards or sanctions for schools with scores at either extreme primarily affect small schools and provide weak incentives to large ones. Nevertheless, we conclude that accountability systems may be worthwhile. Even in states with aggressive financial incentives, the marginal reward to schools for raising student performance is a small fraction of the potential labor market value for students.

Date: 2002
Note: DOI: 10.1257/089533002320950993
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (170)

Downloads: (external link)
http://www.aeaweb.org/articles.php?doi=10.1257/089533002320950993 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aea:jecper:v:16:y:2002:i:4:p:91-114

Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
https://www.aeaweb.org/journals/subscriptions

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Economic Perspectives is currently edited by Enrico Moretti

More articles in Journal of Economic Perspectives from American Economic Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Michael P. Albert ().