EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Comparison of Quantitative and Qualitative Data from a Formative Usability Evaluation of an Augmented Reality Learning Scenario

Dragos Daniel Iordache () and Costin Pribeanu ()

Informatica Economica, 2009, vol. 13, issue 3, 67-74

Abstract: The proliferation of augmented reality (AR) technologies creates opportunities for the devel-opment of new learning scenarios. More recently, the advances in the design and implementation of desktop AR systems make it possible the deployment of such scenarios in primary and secondary schools. Usability evaluation is a precondition for the pedagogical effectiveness of these new technologies and requires a systematic approach for finding and fixing usability problems. In this paper we present an approach to a formative usability evaluation based on heuristic evaluation and user testing. The basic idea is to compare and integrate quantitative and qualitative measures in order to increase confidence in results and enhance the descriptive power of the usability evaluation report.

Keywords: augmented reality; multimodal interaction; e-learning; formative usability evaluation; user testing; heuristic evaluation (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2009
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://revistaie.ase.ro/content/51/007%20-%20Iordache,%20Pribeanu.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aes:infoec:v:13:y:2009:i:3:p:67-74

Access Statistics for this article

Informatica Economica is currently edited by Ion Ivan

More articles in Informatica Economica from Academy of Economic Studies - Bucharest, Romania Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Paul Pocatilu ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aes:infoec:v:13:y:2009:i:3:p:67-74