Missing work: absenteeism at Pepperell Manufacturing Co. in 1883

Joyce Burnette ()
Additional contact information
Joyce Burnette: Department of Economics, Wabash College, Crawfordsville, IN, USA

Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History, 2021, vol. 15, issue 3, 755-786

Abstract: While factories are usually thought to have disciplined workers, I find that absence rates at a US textile factory in 1883 were fairly high—9% if breaks up to 4 weeks are considered absences. Women’s absence rates were about 50% higher than those of men. While I find only weak support for economic motives, I find strong support for leisure-related motives for absences. Absences were high near weekends and holidays, and for special events, and absences were less likely when it rained. When studying how much people worked, we should not assume that days worked by employees matched days of operation for the employer.

Keywords: Work; intensity; ·; Textile; factory; ·; Absence; ·; Weavers; ·; Absenteeism; ·; Days; of; work (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: J22 N31 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-020-00215-0 (application/pdf)
Access to full text is restricted to journal subscribers

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:afc:cliome:v:15:y:2021:i:3:p:755-786

Access Statistics for this article

Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History is currently edited by Claude Diebolt, Dora Costa and Jean-Luc Demeulemeester

More articles in Cliometrica, Journal of Historical Economics and Econometric History from Association Française de Cliométrie (AFC) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by ().