The Fourth Industrial Revolution and the Future of the Labour Intensive Sectors in the Developing Countries: “The Hailstorm in a Cup of Tea”
Thulani Guliwe ()
Additional contact information
Thulani Guliwe: Gauteng Enterprise Propeller
Africagrowth Agenda, 2019, vol. 16, issue 1, 14-18
Abstract:
The advent of the Fourth Industrial Revolution (4IR) is envisaged to have serious disruptive effects, especially in the developing countries, companies, governments and broadly, the welfare system. Despite the current sluggish economic growth and the low employment levels, the 4IR has a potential to replace thousands and millions of workers with machines such as robots, 3D printers and artificial intelligence. This implies a major shift from labour-intensive to capital intensive sectors. The proponents of the 4IR argue that some of the current skills will be deemed obsolete and learners pursuing various careers would end up doing different jobs. Considering that Africa still grapples with the basic challenges of water, electricity, broadband connection and access to internet, it will be difficult to adapt to the Fourth Industrial Revolution which requires investments in the new technologies. Apart from all the bread and butter challenges, the developing countries have limited alternatives, either to ‘adapt or perish.’ On the other hand, the potential rise in unemployment would mean the reduction in fiscus or revenue collection and poor service delivery. Small businesses and most people at the low end are likely to become poorer, while the inequality gaps widen in a speed unprecedented in the history, due to mass production and dumping of cheap goods. Given that most developing countries have smaller markets, consumption is likely to drop due to the potential displacement effects. In the past, the developing world used to attract investments based on the cheap labour as a competitive advantage and they are likely to lose it. “Reshoring” will further exacerbate the current economic woes. Countries with low skill levels, low investments and lack of creativity are more likely to trail behind, while investors and inventors are likely to be winners in this equation.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.co.za/content/journal/10520/EJC-14771ab30f?fromSearch=true (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:afj:journ2:v:16:y:2019:i:1:p:14-18
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Africagrowth Agenda from Africagrowth Institute Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Kirk De Doncker ().