Liberalisation and regulation in the financial crisis – is behavioural economics a solution?

Liviu-George Maha, Paula-Elena Diacon and Gabriel Donici
Additional contact information
Paula-Elena Diacon: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iaşi

Theoretical and Applied Economics, 2013, vol. XX, issue 3(580), 147-152

Abstract: The causes of economic crisis are a subject of intense debate, most opinions of economists ranging from the liberalization of the market to its regulation. We believe that usually there is “sufficient state” and that a change in its level does not have the expected effects. Although on the long term the reduction of the state presence would be preferable, on the medium and short term this would have negative effects, such as the reduction of the number of employees. One solution would be abandoning the simplistic neoclassical economic models, and replacing them with models developed in behavioural economics that would allow state and companies to develop more effective strategies.

Keywords: financial crisis; liberalization; government intervention; behavioural economics; homo oeconomicus. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://store.ectap.ro/articole/846.pdf (application/pdf)
http://www.ectap.ro/articol.php?id=846&rid=96 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:agr:journl:v:xx:y:2013:i:3(580):p:147-152

Access Statistics for this article

Theoretical and Applied Economics is currently edited by Mircea Dinu

More articles in Theoretical and Applied Economics from Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania / Editura Economica Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Mircea Dinu ().