On the life and death of distance
Theoretical and Applied Economics, 2017, vol. XXIV, issue 1(610), Spring, 207-214
Buch et al. (2004) explain the “distance puzzle” suggesting that the distance coefficient only measures the importance of bilateral trade with distant countries relative to closer ones, while a large part of the positive effect of decreased distance costs on trade volumes can be captured in the intercept – expected to be positively influenced. Comparing the course of the intercept when trade growth is included to when removed (using an adjusted specification for the model), we do not seem to find any evidence that the impact of (assumed) decreased distance costs can be traced in the intercept. We also find no “death of distance” in “relative” trade over time, consistent with the majority of literature.
Keywords: gravity model; distance puzzle; distance coefficient; bilateral trade. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:agr:journl:v:xxiv:y:2017:i:1(610):p:207-214
Access Statistics for this article
Theoretical and Applied Economics is currently edited by Marin Dinu
More articles in Theoretical and Applied Economics from Asociatia Generala a Economistilor din Romania - AGER Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Marin Dinu ().