Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs

Hongli Feng, Catherine Kling and Philip Gassman

Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues, 2004, vol. 19, issue 3, 6

Abstract: Land retirement and other agricultural conservation actions contribute greenhouse gas offsets and water quality improvements and reduce erosion and nitrogen runoff. Shifting the programmatic focus to carbon would enhance C sequestration and reduce nitrogen runoff, but would likely increase erosion.

Keywords: Environmental; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2004
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/94004/files/2004-3-09_1_.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs (2010)
Working Paper: Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs (2004)
Working Paper: Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs (2004)
Working Paper: Carbon Sequestration, Co-Benefits, and Conservation Programs (2004)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aaeach:94004

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.94004

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Choices: The Magazine of Food, Farm, and Resource Issues from Agricultural and Applied Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().