Carbon-accounting methods and reforestation incentives

Oscar Cacho, Robyn L. Hean and Russell M. Wise

Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2003, vol. 47, issue 2, 27

Abstract: The emission of greenhouse gases, particularly carbon dioxide, and the consequent potential for climate change are the focus of increasing international concern. Temporary land-use change and forestry projects (LUCF) can be implemented to offset permanent emissions of carbon dioxide from the energy sector. Several approaches to accounting for carbon sequestration in LUCF projects have been proposed. In the present paper, the economic implications of adopting four of these approaches are evaluated in a normative context. The analysis is based on simulation of Australian farm–forestry systems. Results are interpreted from the standpoint of both investors and landholders. The role of baselines and transaction costs are discussed.

Keywords: Resource/Energy; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2003
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (43)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/116186/files/1467-8489.00208.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Carbon‐accounting methods and reforestation incentives (2003)
Working Paper: Carbon-Accounting Methods and Reforestation Incentives (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aareaj:116186

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.116186

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search (aesearch@umn.edu).