Comparing economic performance of organic and conventional U.S. beef farms using matching samples
Jeffrey Gillespie and
Richard Nehring
Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 2013, vol. 57, issue 2, 15
Abstract:
Economic performance measures of organic and transitioning-to-organic cow–calf farms are compared with those of non-organic cow–calf farms. A method of matching samples is used for the comparison, estimating sample average treatment effects for the subpopulation of the treated. Each organic farm is matched with one non-organic farm that is involved in the same beef industry segments and farm size classes, and in the same region. Furthermore, farmer demographic, farming system, and technology variables are used to identify matches. Bias is reduced by estimating separate weighted regression functions for the treated and untreated groups. Results suggest that higher cost of organic production is due primarily to higher capital recovery, taxes and insurance, and overhead costs. Evidence is found for differences in beef enterprise profitability by organic status.
Keywords: Livestock; Production/Industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/241866/files/ajar610.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
Journal Article: Comparing economic performance of organic and conventional U.S. beef farms using matching samples (2013) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:aareaj:241866
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.241866
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().