EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

New Red-blushed Pear to Boost Grower Profitability

Kerry Stott, Mark O'Connel, Ian Goodwin, Susanna Turpin and Bill Malcolm

AFBM Journal, 2018, vol. 15

Abstract: A discounted net cash flow (NCF) model incorporating Monte Carlo simulation was developed to quantify the net benefits and risks of growing the new red-blushed pear cultivar ‘ANP-0131’ (Deliza®) on a representative orchard block in Victoria’s Goulburn Valley. Results were compared to those for retaining a traditional low-density (343 trees/ha) planting of ‘Packham’s Triumph’. ‘ANP-0131’ was grafted to Quince A rootstock and trained on Open Tatura trellis at densities of 1,481, 2,222 or 4,444 trees/ha; these are three of the training system x rootstocks x tree spacing combinations currently being investigated at Agriculture Victoria’s experimental orchard in Tatura. The trees in the experimental orchard are currently in their fifth year of a potential life-span of 30 years and have been fruiting for the last three years. Hence, the analysis is prospective and based on crucial assumptions concerning pack-outs, prices and yields. From 10,000 simulations it was found that growers could invest in the new ‘ANP-0131’ pear system with confidence. Subject to the law of diminishing returns, the most profitable planting was 2,222 trees/ha, for which the mean Net Present Value (NPV) was $258,471/ha evaluated over 30 years using a discount rate of 4.5% real. The Modified Internal Rate of Return (MIRR) was 10.9 per cent, beating the real nine per cent return on Australian equities. The payback period ranged from 7 to 11 years from best to worst case scenarios. The relative advantage of the new planting over the existing planting of ‘Packham’s Triumph’ was clear; the mean annuity of the NPV for the new planting was $15,835/ha p.a., the NCF for the existing planting was a modest $4,595/ha p.a. and there was a 20 per cent chance that it would lose money in any one year.

Keywords: Crop Production/Industries; Farm Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/284947/files/A ... tt-et-al-2c0n703.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:afbmau:284947

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.284947

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in AFBM Journal from Australasian Farm Business Management Network Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:ags:afbmau:284947