EFFECTS OF NON-PRICE EXPORT PROMOTION: SOME EVIDENCE FOR COTTON

H. Solomon and Henry Kinnucan

Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics, 1993, vol. 37, issue 01, 15

Abstract: An Annington-type trade model is estimated to determine the effects of government-subsidized export promotion on the demand for U.S. cotton in the Pacific Rim. Results show a significant relationship between promotion expenditures and U.S. market share in four of the six countries examined. One of the two countries exhibiting a non-significant effect had very low promotion expenditures, suggesting that a minimal level of funding may be necessary to achieve a market response. The hypothesis that export promotion has a carryover period lasting beyond one year in general is supported by the data. The question of the economic impacts of export promotion on domestic producers and taxpayers must await additional research.

Keywords: Marketing (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1993
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/22380/files/37010001.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: EFFECTS OF NON‐PRICE EXPORT PROMOTION: SOME EVIDENCE FOR COTTON (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ajaeau:22380

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.22380

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Australian Journal of Agricultural Economics from Australian Agricultural and Resource Economics Society Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().