How Potential Carbon Policies Could Affect Where and How Cotton Is Produced in the United States

Lawton Nalley, Michael Popp, Zara Niederman, Kristofor R. Brye and Marty B. Matlock

Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 2012, vol. 41, issue 2, 17

Abstract: Using life cycle assessment methodology, this analysis evaluates how two carbon reduction strategies affect cotton plantings regionally and methods used to produce cotton. Because cotton production emits large amounts of carbon, the design of a reduction policy as either excluding soil sequestration through cap-and-trade or including it through carbon offset is likely to affect the success of the policy. A cap-and-trade program that ignores the amount of carbon cotton would sequester in the soil during its life cycle could increase net emissions by rewarding producers whose crops emit limited carbon directly but also sequester little carbon in the ground.

Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; Environmental Economics and Policy; Production Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/132531/files/A ... 215x231%20Nalley.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: How Potential Carbon Policies Could Affect Where and How Cotton Is Produced in the United States (2012)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:arerjl:132531

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.132531

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Agricultural and Resource Economics Review from Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().