The Impact of Four Alternative Policies to Decrease Soda Consumption

Yizao Liu (), Rigoberto Lopez and Chen Zhu

Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 2014, vol. 43, issue 01, 16

Abstract: We examine the impact of four policy options on consumption of carbonated soft drinks (CSDs) by estimating a random-coefficient discrete-choice model of demand. Policy simulations using demand estimates indicate that the impacts of banning television advertising, limiting container size, and limiting calories on total consumption would be similar—an estimated 15.40–15.75 percent reduction. However, limiting calories would have a significantly greater impact on consumption of regular CSDs (–28.89 percent) and on calories consumed from CSDs (–19.34 percent). A tax on calories was least effective in curtailing overall consumption and consumption of regular CSDs.

Keywords: Consumer/Household Economics; Demand and Price Analysis; Industrial Organization (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2014
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/165904/files/ARER2014%2043x1%20AEA%20Liu.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: The Impact of Four Alternative Policies to Decrease Soda Consumption (2014)
Journal Article: The Impact of Four Alternative Policies to Decrease Soda Consumption (2014)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:arerjl:165904

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.165904

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Agricultural and Resource Economics Review from Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().