EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

THE IMPORTANCE OF THE MARKET AREA DETERMINATION FOR ESTIMATING AGGREGATE BENEFITS OF PUBLIC GOODS: TESTING DIFFERENCES IN RESIDENT AND NONRESIDENT WILLINGNESS TO PAY

John Loomis and Armando Gonzalez-Caban

Agricultural and Resource Economics Review, 1996, vol. 25, issue 2, 10

Abstract: A combined telephone contact-mail booklet-telephone interview of California and New England households regarding their willingness to pay for fire management in California and Oregon's old-growth forests was performed to test hypotheses regarding the spatial extent of the public goods market. Using a multiple-bounded contingent valuation question, the study found that New England households' annual willingness to pay for the California and Oregon programs was statistically different from zero. This analysis points out that households receive benefits from fire protection of old-growth forests in states other than their own. In this case study, limiting the survey sample to state residents where the National Forest is located would reflect about 20% of the national benefits. However, using resident values as a proxy for nonresidents would overstate the national benefits by 75%, since the values per household are significantly different. This finding suggests more emphasis in future surveys on selecting an institutionally and economically relevant sample frame rather than an expedient one.

Keywords: Consumer/Household; Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1996
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/31404/files/25020161.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:arerjl:31404

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.31404

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Agricultural and Resource Economics Review from Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2022-07-18
Handle: RePEc:ags:arerjl:31404