De la cogestion agricole à la cogestion rurale. L'exemple de la politique de la montagne

Samuel Martin and Gilles Novarina

Économie rurale, 1991, vol. 201

Abstract: It is often considered that ily land can only be revitalized through actions undertaken by farmersespescially, animal farmers. Howerver, most of the time, farmers projects are subject to public subsidies, and the outmigration of a significant proportion of the agricultural labour force. As a consequence, they are campelled to discuss the conditions of their own survival with other rural decision markers. The adequate polical structures for such a bargain are local communities, which for long have been neglected by farmers. Infact, in front of development problems which are in essence more rural than agricultural, the latters are experienciong difficulties in their new role, at the level of local communities as well as within their own professional unions.

Keywords: Community/Rural/Urban; Development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1991
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/351648/files/e ... 1_num_201_1_4166.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ersfer:351648

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.351648

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Économie rurale from French Society of Rural Economics (SFER Société Française d'Economie Rurale) Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().