Price Effects of a Lack of Speculation

Roger W. Gray

Food Research Institute Studies, 1967, vol. 07, issue Supplement, 18

Abstract: The theoretical proposition that profitable speculation is pricestabilizing is not subject to direct empirical testing in the context of commodity futures markets. The reasons for this are twofold: (1) if all commodity futures trading is viewed as speculation, then this is a zero-sum game which moots the question of profitability; yet (2) if only that trading which is classified as speculation, in contradistinction to hedging, be considered, then the stabilizing effect is seen to be indirect, since it is the hedgers who perform the relevant temporal reallocation of stocks. Evidence of the price effects of speculation in commodity futures contracts is therefore sought in terms of the facilitation of hedging. A convenient and important case is provided by the three active American wheat futures markets-at Chicago, Kansas City, and Minneapolis. It is demonstrated here that the two latter markets, with low levels of speculation, are able to absorb the hedging positions which come to them only because substantial speculation is transfused from Chicago, through spreading. Evidence is also adduced to show that this spreading responds directly to hedging pressures, instead of reflecting price forecasts. Vocational speculation, by floor members of the commodity exchanges, also reflects the anticipation of hedging requirements. Although the data do not allow direct estimates of hedging costs, they strongly support the conclusion that these costs are lower on those markets having more speculation. The conclusion as to the price effects of speculation in commodity futures is then that with ample speculation there is no price effect, whereas the price effect of speculative deficiency is substantial.

Keywords: Demand and Price Analysis; International Relations/Trade (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1967
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/134947/files/fris-1967-07-supplement-339.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:frisst:134947

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.134947

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Food Research Institute Studies from Stanford University, Food Research Institute
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().