EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Beyond Cost Minimisation: Farmers’ Perspectives on the Adoption of GM Fodder in Sweden

Klara Fischer and Sebastian Hess

German Journal of Agricultural Economics, 2021, vol. 70, issue 02

Abstract: Swedish farmers were surveyed about their percep-tions of genetically modified (GM) feed. Livestock in the EU are frequently given feed containing imported genetically modified (GM) crops, with GM fodder often being cheaper for farmers. However, there is also a growing market for ‘GM-free’ animal-based products. While public concerns about GMOs have been studied extensively, less is known about farmers’ views. The limited literature on farmers and GMOs tends to focus on the economic factors influencing their adoption. The present study contributes the per-spective of farmers as members of the general public, thus including a broader set of factors known to be relevant for the public perception of GMOs. The results indicated that farmers were worried about: i) unforeseen consequences for the environment, ii) un-foreseen consequences for human and animal health, and iii) the dominance of multinational companies. Farmers who could expect their farm businesses to benefit from existing GMOs were more positive, whereas those who were unlikely to experience any benefits or who could expect their farm business to be adversely affected were more negative. Nevertheless, adherence to a broader set of positive or negative values suggests that Swedish farmers’ perspectives on GMOs go further than pure considerations of farm management.

Keywords: Agricultural and Food Policy; Crop Production/Industries; Livestock Production/Industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2021
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/343295/files/B ... t%20Minimisation.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:gjagec:343295

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.343295

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in German Journal of Agricultural Economics from Humboldt-Universitaet zu Berlin, Department for Agricultural Economics Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-30
Handle: RePEc:ags:gjagec:343295