Estimating the economic impact of the adoption of novel non-crate sow farrowing systems in the UK
P.J. Cain,
J.G. Guy,
Y. Seddon,
Emma M. Baxter and
S.E. Edwards
International Journal of Agricultural Management, 2013, vol. 02, issue 2, 6
Abstract:
The majority of indoor sows in the UK (around 95 per cent) farrow in conventional farrowing crates. There is pressure from a number of quarters – EU and national regulators, supermarket buyers and consumers – to improve the welfare of sows by adopting ‘‘free’’ farrowing systems. A DEFRA-funded project (under the acronym PigSAFE) conducted by Newcastle University and the Scottish Agricultural College (SAC) has developed and tested such a non-crate farrowing system. The trial monitored the costs and pig performance of over 450 sows which farrowed in either PigSAFE pens or conventional farrowing crates. The data generated in this work were used to construct spreadsheet-based budgeting models and linear programming (LP) models to assess the comparative economic performance of the two systems and determine the likely uptake of the new system. The results suggest that the cost of production under the new farrowing system would be about 1.6% higher than the conventional farrowing crate while pig performance was comparable in the two systems. A survey showed that UK producers were prepared to consider the new systems when renewing their farrowing accommodation, although the modelling exercise suggests that a price premium would still be required to ensure the viability of the new systems.
Keywords: Livestock Production/Industries; Production Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/164361/files/BZF808B113_Cain.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ijameu:164361
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.164361
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Agricultural Management from Institute of Agricultural Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().