Facilitating small grain production system innovation in the Western Cape, South Africa
Tyler Mark,
Joshua Detre,
Paul M. Darby and
Michael E. Salassi
International Journal of Agricultural Management, 2013, vol. 03, issue 2, 10
Abstract:
To reach the US 2022 mandate of 136.3 billion litres of annual biofuel production, multiple sources must be integrated into the renewable biofuels supply chain. Energy cane appears well suited to help meet this mandate, particularly in Louisiana. Although not traditionally grown, production similarities to sugarcane make it an attractive option for Louisiana farmers if they are offered the ‘right price.’ If farmers are to switch hectares from sugarcane to energy cane, cellulosic ethanol processors must provide farmers an additional $2.84/MT and $3.41/MT on a third and fourth stubbling above breakeven to make the net revenue on a per tonne basis from energy cane equal to that of sugarcane. Providing farmers with the right monetary incentive is only part of the equation for ethanol processors, as they also need to determine if cellulosic ethanol from energy cane is competitive with corn ethanol. A breakeven analysis is utilized to determine the monetary incentive needed to cover the cost of production. An additional equation is used to evaluate the cost of cellulosic ethanol so that comparisons may be drawn between cellulosic costs and traditional corn ethanol costs. Our results indicate that this occurs at enzyme prices of $0.04/l (projected enzyme costs), irrespective of energy cane yields, stubbling length, and/or corn prices. Since 2007, enzyme costs for the lignocellulosic ethanol process have fallen by $0.07/l, which have increased the competitiveness of cellulosic ethanol relative to corn ethanol.
Keywords: Crop Production/Industries; Farm Management; Resource/Energy Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/200238/files/89_Detre.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:ijameu:200238
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.200238
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in International Journal of Agricultural Management from Institute of Agricultural Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search (aesearch@umn.edu).