Are the Poor Protected from Budget Cuts? Evidence for Argentina

Martin Ravallion

Journal of Applied Economics, 2002, vol. 05, issue 01, 27

Abstract: Macroeconomic adjustment programs often emphasize the need to protect social spending from cuts, and to protect pro-poor spending in particular. But does this happen in practice during fiscal contractions? The paper presents evidence for Argentina. Using aggregate time series data the paper first finds that social spending was not protected historically, although more "pro-poor" social spending was no more vulnerable. Turning next to new data for an externally-financed workfare scheme introduced in response to a macro crisis, the paper finds that this program was far better targeted than other social spending. However, it appears that the program still had to assure that a small but relatively well-protected share of its benefits went to the non-poor. This appears to be a political economy constraint.

Keywords: Food Security and Poverty; Public Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/44429/files/ravallion.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Journal Article: Are the Poor Protected from Budget Cuts? Evidence for Argentina (2002)
Journal Article: Are the Poor Protected from Budget Cuts? Evidence for Argentina (2002)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jaecon:44429

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.44429

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Applied Economics from Universidad del CEMA Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().