Forage Options and Drought Risk: A South Dakota Case Study

Scott Fausti, Mdrezwanul Parvez, Thandi Nleya, Patricia Johnson, Kenneth Olsen and John Rickertsen

Journal of the ASFMRA, 2013, vol. 2013, 18

Abstract: In the Northern Great Plains region, crop and livestock producers view forage crop production as an important component of their farm management system. During periods of increased drought risk, alternative annual forage crops may provide producers with a risk reducing alternative to traditional forage crops. An alternative forage crop production study (20 varieties) was conducted by South Dakota State University over a three year period (2008-2010). Three management decision criteria options were used to evaluate the economic value and economic risk associated with the production of spring and summer annual forage crops (Expected Value, Max-Min, and Minimum Coefficient of Variation). Empirical findings suggest that producer risk management goals and how the alternative forage crop will be used (grazing versus cash crop) should play a role in crop variety selection. We recommend planting both spring and summer varieties to provide diversification during periods of increased drought risk.

Keywords: Farm; Management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2013
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/161495/files/387%20Parvez.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jasfmr:161495

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.161495

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the ASFMRA from American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().