Comparison of Hedging Cost with Other Variable Input Costs

John Michael Riley and John Anderson

Journal of the ASFMRA, 2010, vol. 2010, 9

Abstract: Recent spikes in commodity prices have led to higher margin amounts and option premiums. For the most part, producers have always attributed their lack of use in reducing risk via futures and options markets to the high cost associated with the use of these markets. This study determines the relative costs of hedging with futures and options and compares these with the costs of other variable inputs. We find that with the exception of hedging corn with both tools and soybeans with options the costs of hedging has increased at roughly the same rate as all other inputs.

Keywords: Demand and Price Analysis; Production Economics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/96378/files/326_Anderson.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Comparison of Hedging Cost with Other Variable Input Costs (2009)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jasfmr:96378

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.96378

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the ASFMRA from American Society of Farm Managers and Rural Appraisers Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().