OPTIMAL INFORMATION ACQUISITION UNDER A GEOSTATISTICAL MODEL

Gregory R. Pautsch, Bruce Babcock and F. Jay Breidt

Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1999, vol. 24, issue 2, 25

Abstract: Studies examining the value of switching to a variable rate technology (VRT) fertilizer program assume producers possess perfect soil nitrate information. In reality, producers estimate soil nitrate levels with soil sampling. The value of switching to a VRT program depends on the quality of the estimates and on how the estimates are used. Larger samples sizes, increased spatial correlation, and decreased variability improve the estimates and increase returns. Fertilizing strictly to the estimated field map fails to account for estimation risk. Returns increase if the soil sample information is used in a Bayesian fashion to update the soil nitrate beliefs in nonsampled sites.

Keywords: Crop; Production/Industries (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/30797/files/24020342.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Optimal Information Acquisition under a Geostatistical Model (1999)
Working Paper: Optimal Information Acquisition Under a Geostatistical Model (1999)
Working Paper: Optimal Information Acquisition Under a Geostatistical Model (1999)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jlaare:30797

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.30797

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics from Western Agricultural Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().