 How Can Cooperatives Reduce Democratic Costs without Incurring Excessive Agency Costs?Daniela M. Pozzabon, Decio Zylbersztajn and Jos Bijman Journal of Rural Cooperation, 2012, vol. 40, issue 2, 27 Abstract: Agricultural cooperatives are often assumed to be less competitive compared to investor-owned firms due to its higher decision-making costs. We have empirically investigated how cooperatives can minimize both democratic and agency costs given differing levels of member participation. We distinguish between horizontal, vertical, and diagonal conflicts of interests, as well as between both direct and opportunity costs. We found that direct agency cost is a smaller concern for cooperatives compared to the risk of exposure to high opportunity agency costs. We also found that the relation between member participation in the board of directors and democratic costs is more complex than often assumed. Finally, we show the difficulties cooperatives face in minimizing both democratic and agency costs. With a lower level of member participation, direct democratic costs may be reduced, but opportunity agency costs may rise as fewer members monitor management. Therefore, cooperatives should either increase member participation or use additional agency mechanisms (such as audits) to prevent agency problems. Keywords: Agribusiness; Community/Rural/Urban Development (search for similar items in EconPapers) Downloads: (external link) Related works: Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jlorco:249592 Access Statistics for this article More articles in Journal of Rural Cooperation from Hebrew University, Center for Agricultural Economic Research Contact information at EDIRC. |
Is your work missing from RePEc? Here is how to contribute.
Questions or problems? Check the EconPapers FAQ or send mail to .
EconPapers is hosted by the
School of Business at Örebro University.