Building a 21st Century Rural Workforce

Martin Shields and Anastasia Snyder

Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 2007, vol. 37, issue 01, 4

Abstract: It is no secret that much of rural America is struggling economically. Despite similar employment growth rates, nonmetropolitan areas tend to have relatively higher unemployment and underemployment rates and slower population growth rates than their metropolitan counterparts.1 Additionally, over the past 15 years, evidence from several states suggests that nonmetropolitan job losses have been in relatively high paying sectors, whereas growing sectors in the rural economy tend to pay relatively low-wages (Shields and Vivanco 2003). One important consequence of this dynamic is an increase in the disparity between metropolitan and nonmetropolitan household incomes. For example, Bureau of Economic Analysis data show that over the period 1969-2002, the average state metropolitan nominal per capita income increased by 97.5 percent (to $31,264) whereas the average nonmetropolitan state per capita income increased by only 91.5 percent (to $24,635). The upshot? Many parts of rural America have lower incomes and are falling further behind.

Keywords: Labor; and; Human; Capital (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/132978/files/07-1-11.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jrapmc:132978

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.132978

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy from Mid-Continent Regional Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().