To Inform or Influence? The Difference between Data Released by Nonprofits and by the Government

Peter F. Orazem and Thu Tran

Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 2020, vol. 50, issue 01

Abstract: Nonprot organizations have become increasingly engaged in disseminating information. Unlike federal statistics that are collected with rigidly proscribed procedures, nonprots have an advocacy role that may in uence the information they release and the interpretations they derive from that data. While federal statistics are released to inform opinion, nonprot statistics are released to in uence opinion. Using as cases the Feeding America county food insecurity statistics, the United Way ALICE estimates of working poor, and the MIT Living Wage Calculator, we show how the desire to in uence policy can lead nonprots to release data characterized by awed methodology and misleading or implausible values. Because errors or biases in federal data have been widely researched and publicized through peer review, users can adjust to the known noise in the data. Flaws in data reported by the nonprots are not made transparent, and so users will make bad decisions if they assume the information is correct.

Keywords: Consumer/Household Economics; Food Security and Poverty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/339941/files/Orazem.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:jrapmc:339941

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.339941

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy from Mid-Continent Regional Science Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().