Dynamic vs. Static Models for Erosion Control Policy Research

James Shortle and John A. Miranowski

Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council, 1983, vol. 12, issue 01, 6

Abstract: In recent studies of erosion control in agricultural production it has been standard practice to use timeless or static models of agricultural production processes. In this paper implications of a dynamic model of agricultural production for erosion control decision making are compared to those of a static model. On the basis of this cimparison it is suggested that future research on the economics of erosion control and erosion control policy may benefit from the use of dynamic modeling methods.

Keywords: Land Economics/Use; Resource/Energy Economics and Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1983
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/159503/files/Dynamic%20vs%20Static.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
Working Paper: Dynamic vs Static Models for Erosion Control Policy Research (1983)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:nareaj:159503

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.159503

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of the Northeastern Agricultural Economics Council from Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().