Economics at your fingertips  


John M. Halstead, A.E. Luloff and Thomas H. Stevens

Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 1992, vol. 21, issue 2, 10

Abstract: Protest bids are often excluded during analysis of contingent valuation method data. It is suggested that this procedure might introduce significant bias. Protest bids are often registered by respondents who may actually place a higher- or lower-than-average value on the commodity in question but refuse to pay on the basis of ethical or other reasons. Exclusion of protest bids may therefore bias willingness to pay (WTP) results, but the direction of bias is indeterminate a priori.

Keywords: Resource; /Energy; Economics; and; Policy (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1992
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (81) Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link) (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link:

DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.29000

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Northeastern Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics from Northeastern Agricultural and Resource Economics Association Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().

Page updated 2021-12-07
Handle: RePEc:ags:nejare:29000