Specialty Crop Participation in Federal Risk Management Programs
Sharon Raszap Skorbiansky,
Gregory Astill,
Stephanie Rosch,
Elizabeth Higgins,
Jennifer Ifft and
Bradley Rickard
Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America, 2022, vol. 2022, issue Economic Information Bulletin Number (EIB-241)
Abstract:
This study characterizes recent changes in Federal Crop Insurance Program (FCIP) and Noninsured Crop Disaster Program (NAP) use by specialty crop farmers, compares differences among conventional and organic farms, and investigates the reasons some farmers choose whether to participate in these programs. Specialty crop growers increased the value of their crops insured by FCIP products from about $12 billion in 2011 to about $21 billion in 2020 (not adjusted for inflation). A case study of nine specialty crop growers in New York State explores reasons they choose whether to participate in these Federal programs.
Keywords: Agribusiness; Farm Management; Land Economics/Use; Political Economy; Production Economics; Risk and Uncertainty (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/329917/files/U ... ment%20Programs.html (text/html)
Related works:
Working Paper: Specialty Crop Participation in Federal Risk Management Programs (2022) 
Working Paper: Specialty Crop Participation in Federal Risk Management Programs (2022) 
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uersaw:329917
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.329917
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Amber Waves:The Economics of Food, Farming, Natural Resources, and Rural America from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().