Budgeting Techniques in Estimating Farm Adjustments and Marginal Returns
Earl O. Heady and
Ross V. Baumann
Journal of Agricultural Economics Research, 1953, vol. 05, issue 3, 4
Abstract:
Prediction in production economics helps individuals and groups to make choices among the uses of resources. Prediction is usually mad by using a sample drawn from a population in which the variables quantities, or parameters to be estimated are already in existence. But in many situations with which biological and economic research workers deal, the parameters they want to predict are not found in an existing population because farmers have not yet used the recommended production techniques. They therefore frequently must formulate predictions either by inference from a sample that is assumed to represent a population, or by budgeting procedures. Conventional budgeting procedures frequently have limited usefulness because the empirical data are assumed to be discrete, linear, and without error. This article brings out some refinements in conventional budgeting procedure. These suggested modifications are believed to increase the information that can be gained from a smaller number of budgets, and to give greater knowledge of the predicational error involved.
Keywords: Research; Methods/Statistical; Methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1953
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://ageconsearch.umn.edu/record/143872/files/3Heady_5_3.pdf (application/pdf)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ags:uersja:143872
DOI: 10.22004/ag.econ.143872
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of Agricultural Economics Research from United States Department of Agriculture, Economic Research Service Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by AgEcon Search ().