WORK LIFE BALANCE INITIATIVES AND SERVICE ENCOUNTERS EMPLOYEES PERSPECTIVE

Badar Zaman (), Naveed Anwar () and Raj Kumar Lohano
Additional contact information
Badar Zaman: Phd Scholar at Iqra University, Karachi
Naveed Anwar: Assistant Professor at ZABIST Larkana Campus
Raj Kumar Lohano: Phd Scholar at Iqra University, Karachi

IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS), 2015, vol. 11, issue 2, 108-122

Abstract: PurposeHospitals are very vital as an element in Quality Care delivery and their evaluation in these terms on perpetual basis are much needed as these organizations contribute in improving health outcomes for general people.Hospitals, especially privately owned, are also run like businesses these days to remain competitive in the respective arena.The environment and situation faced by many hospitals are often complicated and which definitely requires insightful solutions to steer the direction of these businesses.This study was focused on the application of group decisionmaking tool, DEMATEL as one of the valid methods in MultiCriteria Decision Making MCDM.Methodology The study was exploratory in nature and efforts were made to justify by highlighting the criteria prioritization procedure to be undertaken by any healthcare organization.A slight deviation from standard foursteps of DEMATEL, a course of action was created in shape of eightstep procedure to exhibit a practical approach rather than mathematical theory approach.In order to make it more empirical in nature, a fivestage research framework was also devised and acted upon with the help of three separate questionnaires.Avedis Donabedian’s 1988 Quality Care framework was followed and multiple variables were devised, importance ratings were collected from patients on these devised variables and after reduction of variables in to manageable latent factors, called criteria in the study, DEMATEL method was applied to depict the prioritization of Quality Care criteria for the delivery of quality service via digraph.FindingsThe graphical representation through digraph showed that criteria were vertically divided in two halves as C1, C5, and C4 are shown as criteria influencing the lower half criteria C3, C6, and C2.The horizontal span of digraph reflected the importance of criteria prioritized and showed C1 criterion as the most important and C2 criterion with least importance.ImplicationsThe prioritization of the criteria along with their cause and effect distribution gave an insight into the constitution framework of localized healthcare services of Karachi, Pakistan.

Keywords: page; error (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2015
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://ibtjbs.ilmauniversity.edu.pk/journal/jbs/11 ... es%20Perspective.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aib:ibtjbs:v:11:y:2015:i:2:p:108-122

DOI: 10.46745/ilma.ibtjbs.2015.112.9

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in IBT Journal of Business Studies (JBS) from Ilma University, Faculty of Management Science Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Syed Kashif Rafi ().