FROM ORTHODOXY TO HETERODOXY: FINANCIAL CRISIS LITERATURE COMPARED

Ignacio MARTÃ Nez and Gabriel Mursa

Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), 2017, vol. 63, issue 3, 71 - 87

Abstract: In this paper we’ll attempt to explain the connection between interventionism in financial markets, financial crises and economic downturns, as the main cause of the financial crisis mainstream models; As well as the connection between the theories of Austrian and Minsky’s economic cycle as branches of heterodox economic theory. In order to achieve this target, we’ll begin with a brief introduction of mainstream financial crises models in the orthodox economic literature, then we’ll examine the statements of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory and the Financial Instability Hypothesis, and evaluate whether a connection between the two. We conclude that Financial Instability Hypothesis can be studied as a particular case of the Austrian Business Cycle Theory. JEL Codes - B53, E12, E14, E58, G01

Keywords: financial crisis; boom-bust cycles; Hyman Minsky; Austrian School; Knut Wiksell (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/1033 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:63:y:2017:i:3:p:71-87:n:51

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice) from Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru ().