Ranking Alternatives by Pairwise Comparisons Matrix and Priority Vector

Jaroslav Ramík

Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), 2017, vol. 64, issue 4, 85 - 95

Abstract: The decision making problem considered here is to rank n alternatives from the best to the worst, using information given by the decision maker(s) in the form of an n×n pairwise comparisons (PC) matrix. We investigate pairwise comparisons matrices with elements from a real interval which is a traditional multiplicative approach used in Analytic hierarchy process (AHP). Here, we deal with two essential elements of AHP: measuring consistency of PC matrix and the method of eliciting the priority vector by which the final ranking of alternatives is derived. Classical approaches introduced by T. Saaty in AHP are compared with later approaches based on the AHP criticism published in the literature. Advantages and disadvantages of both approaches are highlighted and discussed. JEL Codes - C44

Keywords: pairwise comparisons matrix; priority vector; ranking alternatives; analytic hierarchy process; AHP (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/1074 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:64:y:2017:i:4:p:85-95:n:94

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice) from Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru ().