EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Does Voracious Behavior favor Efficient Market Hypothesis? Role of Performance Measures

Attayah Shafique, Usman Ayub, Muhammad Shariq and Muhammad Ashfaq
Additional contact information
Attayah Shafique: Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Usman Ayub: COMSATS University Islamabad
Muhammad Shariq: National University of Sciences & Technology
Muhammad Ashfaq: IU International University of Applied Sciences

Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice), 2022, vol. 69, issue 4, 631 - 649

Abstract: Greed plays an important in the fluctuations of stock prices because investors want profits irrespective of the risk taken by them. This study aims to determine, whether, in times of rising trends in the market, greediness is good for the investor or not. Secondly, investors can get high profits by beating the market or not. The already formed deciles portfolios of listed companies on NYSE, AMEX, and NASDAQ based on size and book to market value are taken from the Kenneth R. French data library from Dec 1994 to Dec 2021. Sharpe, Treynor, and Sortino ratios are used as the measure of the performance of portfolios. Ordinal logistic regression is used to calculate the probability at different benchmark levels to determine, whether the investor gets the profit by beating the market or not. The results show that the investor who used the Sharpe ratio has an average 85% probability of getting a profit of more than 75% of the benchmark of S&P-500 in all periods. Thus, the investors’ greediness is good in the long run if the investor considers total risk and can beat the market. By using the Sortino and Treynor ratio, there is an average 50% probability of achieving the profit up to the benchmark which is S&P-500. This means that the investors are not able to beat the market thus, support the efficient market hypothesis by considering the downside and market risk.

Keywords: greed; benchmark; efficient market hypothesis; performance measures. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
http://saeb.feaa.uaic.ro/index.php/saeb/article/view/1744 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:69:y:2022:i:4:p:631-649:n:6

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Scientific Annals of Economics and Business (continues Analele Stiintifice) from Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Sireteanu Napoleon-Alexandru ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:aic:saebjn:v:69:y:2022:i:4:p:631-649:n:6