Reflecting Power and Identity: The Cultural Significance of Jin Dynasty Mirrors and Their Transmission Across Eurasia

Xueqian Wang, Peng Sun and Teik Soon Boey
Additional contact information
Xueqian Wang: Institute of International Education, New Era University College, Kajang, Malaysia & School of Design and Product, Jilin Animation Institute (JAI), Changchun, China.
Peng Sun: School of Management, Jinan University (JNU), Guangzhou, China.
Teik Soon Boey: Institute of International Education, New Era University College, Kajang, Malaysia.

Journal of Scientific Reports, 2025, vol. 8, issue 1, 132-148

Abstract: This paper explores the origins, transmission pathways, and cultural significance of mirror culture during the Jin Dynasty (1115–1234). The Jin, founded by the Jurchen people, represents a pivotal period in Chinese history, marked by cultural exchanges and political shifts between the Jurchen, Song, Liao, and Tangut peoples. Mirrors, as both practical objects and powerful symbols, were central to the Jin’s political, religious, and social life. These artifacts not only served utilitarian functions but also conveyed profound spiritual meanings, symbolizing cosmic order, imperial power, and cultural identity. This study investigates the technological advancements and artistic developments in Jin mirror production, analyzing the materials, methods, and iconography that define these objects. Additionally, it examines the role of mirrors in political rituals, religious ceremonies, and social stratification, offering insights into the cultural and ideological landscape of the Jin court. The transmission of Jin mirrors across East Asia and into Central Asia further highlights the empire’s engagement with neighboring cultures, particularly through the Silk Road. By tracing the flow and adaptation of these mirrors in various cultural contexts, this paper contributes to a deeper understanding of the Jin Dynasty’s legacy and its place in the broader Eurasian world. Through this analysis, the study not only enhances our knowledge of the Jin period but also provides new avenues for exploring the intersection of material culture, identity, and power in medieval East Asia.

Keywords: Jin Dynasty; Jurchen culture; mirrors; Silk Road; political symbolism; cultural exchange. (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2025
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://ijsab.com/wp-content/uploads/1081.pdf (application/pdf)
https://www.ijsab.com/jsr-volume-8-issue-1/7642 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aif:report:v:8:y:2025:i:1:p:132-148

Access Statistics for this article

Journal of Scientific Reports is currently edited by Dr. Md Shamim Hossain

More articles in Journal of Scientific Reports from IJSAB International
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Farjana Rahman ().