Intermittent Development of Central Place Systems: The Dynamics of Unification and Breakup

Ruslan V. Dmitriev (), Stanislav A. Gorokhov and Maksim M. Agafoshin
Additional contact information
Ruslan V. Dmitriev: Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Stanislav A. Gorokhov: Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia
Maksim M. Agafoshin: Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia

R-Economy, 2023, vol. 9, issue 2, 140-154

Abstract: Relevance. The development of central place theory has been hindered by its static nature, as it fails to capture transitions between equilibrium states in central place systems. This long-standing problem remains unsolved since the theory's inception 90 years ago. This article presents a solution by examining the cases of system unification and system breakup, where previously independent systems merge or split. Research objective. The study aims to identify the conditions under which central place systems resume continual development following revolutionary transformations in their structure. Data and methods. The research analyzes census data from India (1947-2011) and Yemen (1973-2004) using equations based on the axioms of central place theory. The study also considers isostatic equilibrium as the foundation of central place system structures. Results. The effect of intermittence on the steady evolution of a central place system diminishes rapidly after the unification of two independent systems. In contrast, the adaptation of elements from a previously unified system to new conditions, including reinstating the former hierarchy and spatial structure, takes significantly longer after a system breakup. The study introduces a novel perspective, highlighting that the unification of central place systems tends to lead to progress, whereas the breakup of a unified system results in degradation. Conclusions. The true benefit to a central place system lies not solely in achieving isostatic equilibrium but in maintaining a secure and optimal structure. While these concepts share similarities, they may appear more distinct when examining the central place system as a whole. Equilibrium represents an optimal state for individual hierarchy levels rather than the entire system.

Keywords: central place theory; spatial structure; hierarchical structure; evolution; revolutionary change (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: C21 N97 R12 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2023
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/r-economy/article/view/6989 (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:aiy:journl:v:9:y:2023:i:2:p:140-154

DOI: 10.15826/recon.2023.9.2.009

Access Statistics for this article

R-Economy is currently edited by Irina Turgel

More articles in R-Economy from Ural Federal University, Graduate School of Economics and Management Contact information at EDIRC.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Irina Turgel ().