Approaches to Solve the Problem of Double-Counting Scientific Articles When Evaluating the Effectiveness of Scientific Organizations: Roundtable Discussion
Dmitry Zolotarev ()
Additional contact information
Dmitry Zolotarev: Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology
Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal, 2015, vol. 10, issue 2, 228-242
Approaches to the counting of scientific articles are discussed. Principal attention in the report is paid to fractional counting. It is designated that the method of proportional fractional counting conceptually splits up a scientific result if an article is written by several authors. A combination of proportional fractional counting based on normalization of the affiliations of each article’s author(s), and equal fractional counting based on crossing arrays is suggested. This may have a positive effect, combining the information on an organization’s share of articles and the most valuable collaborations. Participants have pointed that the further research of the raised questions is needed.
Keywords: Scientific article counting methods; proportional fractional counting; equal fractional counting; Web of Science; combinatorics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:akt:journl:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:228-242
Access Statistics for this article
Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal is currently edited by Irina Ilina
More articles in Science Governance and Scientometrics Journal from Russian Research Institute of Economics, Politics and Law in Science and Technology (RIEPL)
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Lubov Pudovkina ().