EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Interpretation of the Verbal Probability Expressions Used in The IFRS – The Differences Observed Between Polish and British Accounting Professionals

Katarzyna Kolesnik, Sylwia Silska-Gembka and Jerzy Gierusz ()
Additional contact information
Jerzy Gierusz: University of Gdansk, Poland

Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 2019, vol. 18, issue 1, 25-49

Abstract: Research Question: Do Polish and British accounting professionals interpret verbal probability expressions (VPEs) differently when presented with identical excerpts from IFRS? Motivation: Our research has been motivated by the ongoing debate of consistent interpretation of VPEs. The major difficulty in the interpretation of these terms is the imperative for the accountants to express their individual subjective judgements. Previous research shows that these expressions may have low communication efficiency (Simon, 2002) as they give way to ‘wide variations in interpretation’ (Chesley, 1986: 196). The lack of consistency in the interpretation of VPEs may limit the usefulness of the financial statements prepared on their basis (Simon, 2002). Idea: We examine the interpretational differences between Poles and the British. We also survey whether the principle of prudence will impact the interpretation manner of the Polish and the British accounting professionals. Data: For the purpose of our study we distributed a questionnaire. 332 questionnaires from Poland and 75 questionnaires from the UK included answers that were subject to the analysis. Tools: We asked a sample of professional accountants from Poland and the UK to interpret the “in context” VPEs used in IFRS establishing the threshold for recognition of various accounting elements. Findings: Our results show that there are differences in the manner the Poles and the British interpret VPEs. Additionally, we indicate that the Polish accountants’ attachment to the prudence principle affects their manner of interpretation. However, we were not able to state whether this principle would not affect the level of probability assigned by the British accountants. Contribution: Our paper provides the first comparative results for Poland and the UK, in terms of surveying professional judgement under with relation to the IFRS.

Keywords: IFRS; interpretation; professional judgement; verbal probability expressions (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M41 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2019
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed

Downloads: (external link)
http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/18_1_2.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ami:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:25-49

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems from Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cristina Tartavulea ().

 
Page updated 2019-06-29
Handle: RePEc:ami:journl:v:18:y:2019:i:1:p:25-49