Professional Skepticism And Auditors' Judgments: Evidence from Tunisia

Hager Ennar () and Salma Damak-Ayadi
Additional contact information
Hager Ennar: University of Tunis El Manar, FSEG, LR99ES24, LIGUE, University of Manouba, Tunisia
Salma Damak-Ayadi: University of Carthage, IHEC, LR99ES24, LIGUE, University of Manouba, Tunisia

Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems, 2024, vol. 23, issue 3, 596-615

Abstract: Research Question- What is the impact of professional skepticism on auditors' judgment across varying levels of control risk? Motivation- Professional skepticism has attracted the attention of various regulators, practitioners, and researchers. However, the empirical results of previous studies have not consistently yielded findings regarding the impact of professional skepticism on auditors' judgment. Idea- This paper aims to investigate the relationship between professional skepticism and auditors' judgment across different control risk scenarios within the Tunisian context. Data- The experimental study comprised 127 auditors. Tools- A between-subjects experiment was conducted, manipulating control risk at two levels (low and high risk). Hurtt (2010) professional skepticism scale was utilized to measure auditors’ professional skepticism. Subsequently, a multivariate regression analysis was performed. Findings- The experimental study provided evidence that professional skepticism leads auditors to exhibit skeptical judgments regarding the assessment of the truthfulness of the client's explanation and the assessment of fraud risk. Additionally, the results show that auditors tend to make more skeptical judgments in a high-risk setting. Contribution- Understanding the role of trait professional skepticism is crucial for practicing auditors and accounting firms. The findings suggest that professional skepticism has a significant effect on auditors’ judgment. Consequently, firms should pay particular attention to the allocation of audit team members based on their level of skepticism.

Keywords: professional skepticism; trait; judgment; Tunisia (search for similar items in EconPapers)
JEL-codes: M42 (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
http://online-cig.ase.ro/RePEc/ami/articles/23_3_7.pdf (application/pdf)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:ami:journl:v:23:y:2024:i:3:p:596-615

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Journal of Accounting and Management Information Systems from Faculty of Accounting and Management Information Systems, The Bucharest University of Economic Studies
Bibliographic data for series maintained by Cristina Tartavulea ().