Measuring the Cost of Bailouts
Deborah Lucas
Annual Review of Financial Economics, 2019, vol. 11, issue 1, 85-108
Abstract:
This review develops a theoretical framework that highlights the principles governing economically meaningful estimates of the cost of bailouts. Drawing selectively on existing cost estimates and augmenting them with new calculations consistent with this framework, I conclude that the total direct cost of the 2008 crisis-related bailouts in the United States was on the order of $500 billion, or 3.5% of GDP in 2009. The largest direct beneficiaries of the bailouts were the unsecured creditors of financial institutions. The estimated cost stands in sharp contrast to popular accounts that claim there was no cost because the money was repaid, and with claims of costs in the trillions of dollars. The cost is large enough to suggest the importance of revisiting whether there might have been less expensive ways to intervene to stabilize markets. At the same time, it is small enough to call into question whether the benefits of ending bailouts permanently exceed the regulatory burden of policies aimed at achieving that goal.
Date: 2019
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (17)
Downloads: (external link)
https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-financial-110217-022532
Full text downloads are only available to subscribers. Visit the abstract page for more information.
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:anr:refeco:v:11:y:2019:p:85-108
Ordering information: This journal article can be ordered from
http://www.annualreviews.org/action/ecommerce
DOI: 10.1146/annurev-financial-110217-022532
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Annual Review of Financial Economics from Annual Reviews Annual Reviews 4139 El Camino Way Palo Alto, CA 94306, USA.
Bibliographic data for series maintained by http://www.annualreviews.org ().